Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jesus RB's avatar

I love the vision! I'm not sure Universal Basic Income (UBI) is a given because I think it's more likely that the gains from technological growth will go to investors/shareholders.

(The short version) I think this because:

- Companies have an interest in maximising returns for shareholders (this includes minimising their tax burden). Money kept by the firm can be reinvested or paid as a dividend.

- Implementing UBI requires immense political will. Companies and shareholders will use their superior resources to lobby against taxes that redistribute gains from tech.

- Coordinating tax law and reporting standards internationally to prevent the use of tax loopholes will be difficult because it requires cooperation across multiple actors with (somewhat) conflicting interests. (e.g. as President of Nation X, why should I care if Nation Y gets fewer revenues if it means that I get a few extra million every year to please my electoral base and ensure my reelection?)

- The status quo has pointed toward inequality within countries rising despite (and likely partially because of) technological progress (see here: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/rising-inequality-a-major-issue-of-our-time/)

It's a great idea, and I would love to talk more about this!

No posts

Ready for more?